Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Sept 23, 2024 19:47:59 GMT
We see this too and the facts show it.
"The ends of a totalitarian system are served by the process of mass formation by the relatively simple expedient of ensuring that the popular narrative is suitably directed. The knowing actors who do this directing are a tiny band whose impact is massively amplified by the mass formation process. These knowing actors may or may not be within the mass formation themselves.
The book starts with an account of the communist ideological take-over of the Polish universities. To quote an article about the book in The Postil 16 Magazine, Ref.[13], “After universities had been emptied of enemies, they had to be filled with ostensible supporters: students from underprivileged social strata who would reward the regime with loyalty for upward social mobility”. In case you wonder what this has to do with feminism, do note that the strategy which has been in play in universities for many years in the West is precisely that. One merely reinterprets “underprivileged social strata” as the notionally oppressed intersectional identity groups – including women
– rather than the economically underprivileged. Preferential hiring and promotion had been the norm in universities for decades before it was formalised as DEI.
Political Ponerology is a rather terrifying work but includes many insights. It is based entirely on psychology, the author opining, in contradiction to Durkheim, that “If we want to understand the laws governing social life, we must first understand the individual human being”. Lobaczewski argues that the individuals who provide the direction for the mass narrative generically exhibit schizoidia. Not to be confused with schizophrenia, schizoidia is characterized by dull emotionality and a weakened feeling for psychological realities. However, those exhibiting schizoidia tend to be adept at exploiting the emotionality of others and regard themselves as intellectually superior to “ordinary” people (though this is not actually the case).
These psychopathic individuals learn to recognise each other from childhood. They have a tendency to invent great doctrines which, when put into print, can serve as the vectors of their totalitarian views. Normal people can accept the doctrine in good faith, by (quote), “assimilating the content of such works in a manner corresponding to their own nature”. But unfortunately, according to Lobaczewski, “Subordinating a normal person to psychologically abnormal individuals has spellbinding, deforming effects
on his personality”.
It is not surprising that, when such a process is in play, the narrative protects itself by disarming the very discipline that would expose it, namely psychology. Lobaczewski writes, “Wherever a society has become enslaved to others or to the rule of its own overtly privileged class, psychology is the first discipline to suffer from censorship and incursions on the part of an administrative body which starts claiming the last word as to what represents scientific truth”. In which context I note that psychology in the West has become a particular stronghold of feminist corruption."
In short, just as feminism is currently proceeding, so did other totalitarian systems before.
Feminism is another totalitarian system that deprives men of their rights on propaganda that deminishes only men. These are the facts.
It's worth reading the whole article.
More in link
empathygap.uk/Feminism%20Cultural%20Collapse%20and%20the%20Rise%20of%20Authoritarianism%20in%20the%20West%20longer%20blog%20version.pdf
"The ends of a totalitarian system are served by the process of mass formation by the relatively simple expedient of ensuring that the popular narrative is suitably directed. The knowing actors who do this directing are a tiny band whose impact is massively amplified by the mass formation process. These knowing actors may or may not be within the mass formation themselves.
The book starts with an account of the communist ideological take-over of the Polish universities. To quote an article about the book in The Postil 16 Magazine, Ref.[13], “After universities had been emptied of enemies, they had to be filled with ostensible supporters: students from underprivileged social strata who would reward the regime with loyalty for upward social mobility”. In case you wonder what this has to do with feminism, do note that the strategy which has been in play in universities for many years in the West is precisely that. One merely reinterprets “underprivileged social strata” as the notionally oppressed intersectional identity groups – including women
– rather than the economically underprivileged. Preferential hiring and promotion had been the norm in universities for decades before it was formalised as DEI.
Political Ponerology is a rather terrifying work but includes many insights. It is based entirely on psychology, the author opining, in contradiction to Durkheim, that “If we want to understand the laws governing social life, we must first understand the individual human being”. Lobaczewski argues that the individuals who provide the direction for the mass narrative generically exhibit schizoidia. Not to be confused with schizophrenia, schizoidia is characterized by dull emotionality and a weakened feeling for psychological realities. However, those exhibiting schizoidia tend to be adept at exploiting the emotionality of others and regard themselves as intellectually superior to “ordinary” people (though this is not actually the case).
These psychopathic individuals learn to recognise each other from childhood. They have a tendency to invent great doctrines which, when put into print, can serve as the vectors of their totalitarian views. Normal people can accept the doctrine in good faith, by (quote), “assimilating the content of such works in a manner corresponding to their own nature”. But unfortunately, according to Lobaczewski, “Subordinating a normal person to psychologically abnormal individuals has spellbinding, deforming effects
on his personality”.
It is not surprising that, when such a process is in play, the narrative protects itself by disarming the very discipline that would expose it, namely psychology. Lobaczewski writes, “Wherever a society has become enslaved to others or to the rule of its own overtly privileged class, psychology is the first discipline to suffer from censorship and incursions on the part of an administrative body which starts claiming the last word as to what represents scientific truth”. In which context I note that psychology in the West has become a particular stronghold of feminist corruption."
In short, just as feminism is currently proceeding, so did other totalitarian systems before.
Feminism is another totalitarian system that deprives men of their rights on propaganda that deminishes only men. These are the facts.
It's worth reading the whole article.
More in link
empathygap.uk/Feminism%20Cultural%20Collapse%20and%20the%20Rise%20of%20Authoritarianism%20in%20the%20West%20longer%20blog%20version.pdf