|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Sept 23, 2024 19:26:16 GMT
Unfortunately,, male victims of false allegations still do not have the same rights as the female perpetrators of these lies. Professor Janice Fiamengo writes in her blog: "In the video, I used a couple of then-recent news items to analyze how media consistently put the spotlight on women as the primary victims of women’s false accusations against men. Even when a man had spent years in prison on a made-up charge, judges and pundits usually expressed concern about the negative effect on other potential female accusers (though evidence of this negative effect was never produced)." More in link substack.com/@fiamengofile/p-148540718
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Sept 23, 2024 19:55:13 GMT
Give women weapons and they will not be held accountable for using them against their intentions, and they will use them for their own selfish purposes to destroy the lives of men and children. "Curiously enough, many people in the community know that false accusations are regularly made, although accusers are seldom punished. For example, in a survey with over 12,500 Australian respondents, more than half agreed with the statement that ‘women going through custody battles often make up or exaggerate claims of domestic violence in order to improve their case, and only 28 per cent disagreed.’[7] This was confirmed in a survey of 68 families by Dr Sotirious Sarantakos, an associate professor of sociology at Charles Sturt University. His survey reveals that a considerable number of allegations are either false or unsubstantiated. Accordingly, ‘the initial allegations of DV were modified considerably by them during the course of the study, particularly when they were faced with the accounts of their children and mothers, admitting in the end that they were neither victims of violence nor acting in self-defence’.[8] A survey of 38 magistrates in Queensland reveals that 74 per cent agree that DVOs are often used for tactical purposes related to such disputes.[9] Likewise, another survey of 68 magistrates from New South Wales indicates that 90 per cent agree that DVOs are commonly sought as a ‘tactical device’ to aid applicants with court disputes and/or to deprive former partners of contact with their biological children.[10] As noted by Bettina Arndt AM," More in link quadrant.org.au/news-opinions/the-law/the-use-and-abuse-of-dvos/
|
|