|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Jan 26, 2020 18:21:34 GMT
*** IMPORTANT NOTICE *** Even if we assume positive intent from professionals involved in Private or Public Family Law, at the end of the day, they're humans and therefore fallible. Even the UK government admits that 5% of every profession is incompetent. I know from personal experience as a former Social Worker, Foster Carer and having self-represented throughout a 4 year custody battle, that many professionals including Social Workers, Healthcare Workers, Police Officers, Solicitors, etc, are not only incompetent but, aware of this and try and mask it by lying almost compulsively. Why am I telling you something that you already know? Well, it's simple really: evidence can prove to be critical! Social Workers and Family Court Advisers (Cafcass) are not used to being scrutinised. They're used to two things: 1) their "authority" never being questioned, and (bizarrely), 2) that the privacy of Family Court somehow protects them from scrutiny - IT DOES NOT! As public servants carrying out their state responsibilities, there is absolutely no expectation of privacy so don't let them tell you otherwise! NEVER assume positive intent. Always say the bare minimum whilst being compliant and co-operative. But more importantly; make sure that you have probative records of wrongdoing. So first things first: install an app on your phone that records all incoming and outgoing calls. In most jurisdictions this is perfectly legal (although it is your responsibility to check). It certainly is in England and Wales. What you can then do with the recording is another matter - publishing it online, for example. But if you have an unadulterated, original recording of a conversation that demonstrates wrongdoing then you can offer that as evidence to the Judge. If you wish, you can also prepare your own transcript of it. Any conversations held in person should be followed up by an email from you to that other person: "Further to our conversation on [date] at [time] at [location], we discussed the following points .
You made the following remarks .
I responded with my position on each point as follows "
Always, ALWAYS, copy that person's boss in on the email. In EW they are legally obliged to provide that sort of information as they are public servants executing their duties on behalf of us, their employees.
Copy anyone in who's relevant with the exception of the Judge.
If the contents of any conversations, whether in person or by telephone, are relevant, then include details of them in your next Position Statement.
Scan every piece of paper you receive as it can be kept safe forever. 3-in-1 printers can be found for £20 to £30. If that's unrealistic, use a friend's or a library. A USB stick can be bought for a fiver; you don't need masses of storage because document files are tiny compared with, say, video files.
A Gmail account comes with more than enough free, online storage for all of your documents, including any recorded phone calls. Try and keep them filed in a well-structured way.
Another benefit of Google is their free 'Office' suite of applications, so you can create any correspondence using it. It's also a great place to store any research you find during your case. Not only is it securely stored in numerous places around the world, but it can be accessed anywhere at anytime via the Internet.
If you're in my jurisdiction of England and Wales, I can personally recommend buying the following book:
The Family Court without a Lawyer: A Handbook for Litigants in Person smile.amazon.co.uk/…/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_JtPkEbGWH…
Generally, advertising on here isn't supported but this isn't an advert, it's an endorsement. Lucy Reed, the Family Law Barrister who wrote it, is a very active campaigner for more openness in the Family Court system and £1 from each sale goes to the Bar Pro Bono Unit. Her website also provides videos illustrating what will happen during Hearings and she's able to answer basic, procedural questions online. She's definitely on our side so if you can find £20, this book will change your life.
All the usual, most significant advice still stands:
Everything you say and do should be in the child's best interests, and not just what you consider to be their best interests, but what general society would consider (look up the legal concept of "the man on the Clapham omnibus").
Nobody is interested in you telling them that you are a great parent so don't waste your breath; DEMONSTRATE what a great parent you are through your actions. This will include engaging with 'the enemy' in a constructive and positive manner.
The system is broken, we all know this. It isn't fit for purpose. We all know this, too. It is causing irreparable harm to thousands of children. Again, we're not strangers to this. But you CAN NOT bring about change to your particular system through your case alone. The fact that you are telling the truth and that everyone else is wrong or is lying is irrelevant, it won't create some enormous exposé that will change the system for the better. So focus on the needs of your children. Stay calm. Listen to as much advice as you get and as time goes by you'll learn which bits to follow and which bits to ignore.
Be polite. Do whatever they ask of you as that demonstrates that your children's needs are at the top of the pile.
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on May 16, 2020 9:59:35 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Apr 18, 2021 10:58:25 GMT
If the court does not apply the law or breaks the basic principles of a fair trial, it intimidates you in a trial in countries where human rights dominate, you can file a complaint or open a trial against such a judge. We emphasize that only in countries that respect human rights, because in those countries where human rights are not respected, it will not work. Unfortunately, there are countries that consider themselves democratic but violate basic human rights. They are also pseudo-democracies that have nothing to do with democracy. www.instagram.com/tv/CNYri-op9BThttp://instagram.com/p/CNYri-op9BT #men #women #equal #father #discriminationmen #discrimination #segregation #falseaccusations #domesticviolence #childsupport #equalparenting #parentalalienation #divorce #fraud #falseaccusationsrape #fatherless #childsharecustody #fahtermatter #law #brokenlaw #familylaw #court #depression, #depressionafterdivorce #Divorce #effectsofdivorce #health #masculinity #mentalhealth #suicidal #suicide #equalpay #equalwork #menrights #humanrights
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Apr 20, 2021 9:14:51 GMT
" Let us explore some of the dynamics which undermine, circumvent, or even paralyses the family court system check and balances, creating an environment of unchecked power conductive to corruption and ill treatment of parents and children. Gang stalking, community mobbing, hate crime, racketeering, or organized stalking are all good way to describe no touch torture mobbing. Distinguishing psychological “no marks” and “no touch” torture technique mobbing constitutes multiple circumstances, acts, or omissions on the part of several contributors. We will be looking at judges, Guardian Ad Litems (GAL), caseworkers, and psychiatrist working together to sell custody of children in family court. Mobbing is a psychological attack that can destroy a person’s life while leaving little to no evidence to incriminate the perpetrators. The goal is to wear down the protective parent by allowing their former abuser to continue torturing them. Then the courts will have crazy rulings that will not protect the children or the protective parent. This leads to high legal fees to fight for the safety of the child and obtain some type of justice." More in link www.torturetraumatherapy.com/post/a-deeper-look-at-no-touch-torture-technique-mobbing-used-by-family-court?fbclid=IwAR2cJd3t9V7yq60hVaqtUT0v7xXTWEIB3GjtkBhuwxCpxdmCAEGYKL4GLYI
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Apr 20, 2021 9:16:53 GMT
This video shows a few different issues and how and what to do with an example in one state in the US, but many of these solutions can be applied to other countries that have similar court procedures. There are many different examples here to help you get through the complexities of court procedures. "Billie Tarascio with Access Legal and Modern Law provides this free of charge webinar on how to represent yourself in family court. Whether you have a divorce, child custody, child support, or enforcement case, this webinar is for you. Learn more at accesslegaldocs.com/
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Apr 20, 2021 9:23:02 GMT
This article describes the opposite parental situation. Unfortunately, in most cases, it is the fathers who are alienated from their own children for the purposes of child support or revenge by their ex. They lose contact with their children, lose health and lose money. Here's how to deal with this torture "Abusive parents will call protection services and have others call as well. The abusive parent will play the victim and get others to believe their story. Concerned people will call protective services and report the protective parent. The typical calls made in one care are around 50. When the protective parent calls for legitimate concerns, they are told by the agency they are trying to get back at the other parent. Protection services will hold the protective parent with custody to an extremely high standard and allow the abusive parent to do as they want. Abusive parents are known to not provided medication to kids, not return them on time, not return them to mental health facilities, and the list goes on and on. They are never charged with medical neglect or anything. If the abusive parent does not respond to them, they just drop the concerns. This is all part of the mobbing technique used by the court. This is all part of a harassing technique on the part of the abusive parent." More in link www.torturetraumatherapy.com/post/tortured-children-being-groomed-to-hate-the-protective-parent
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Apr 20, 2021 9:30:24 GMT
"This video is intended to help those who are dealing with false allegations made against them in family court as part of the ex spouse or partners strategy to limit or prevent contact with the children. For campaigning updates you can follow me on Twitter @brianhudson3333. Please subscribe to this channel to be notified of more self help videos coming soon. If you’d like to help with my evidence based research and you have been falsely accused of crimes in family court, please give 30 mins to complete my survey at www.falseallegationssurvey.com
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Apr 20, 2021 9:32:30 GMT
Preparing for your first court hearing
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Apr 20, 2021 10:12:41 GMT
In Europe is ECHR who protec yours human righs. Jurisdiction The Court has jurisdiction to decide complaints (“applications”) submitted by individuals and States concerning violations of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (commonly referred to as the “European Convention on Human Rights“), which principally concerns civil and political rights. It cannot take up a case on its own initiative. Notably, the person, group or non-governmental organization submitting the complaint (“the applicant”) does not have to be a citizen of a State party. However, complaints submitted to the Court must concern violations of the Convention allegedly committed by a State party to the Convention and that directly and significantly affected the applicant. As of November 2018, there are 47 State parties to the Convention; these include the Member States of the Council of Europe and of the European Union. Some of these States have also ratified one or more of the Additional Protocols to the Convention, which protect additional rights. As of August 1, 2018, the Court also has advisory jurisdiction. Under Protocol 16 to the European Convention, which entered into force on August 1, the highest domestic courts in the States that are a party to the Protocol may request European Court advisory opinions on questions of interpretation of the European Convention and its protocols. The questions must arise out of cases pending before the domestic court. [IJRC] The Case-law Guides by theme series presents the Court’s key judgments, organised by theme and with transversal approach. These reviews of the case-law are regularly updated. This link is guides, which are useful to national courts in Europe. They will help you prepare your legal side under the articles of the European Convention on Human Rights Very useful and important tools to courts. www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=caselaw/analysis/guides&c=#www.coe.int/en/web/impact-convention-human-rights/right-to-a-fair-trialwww.coe.int/en/web/impact-convention-human-rights/equalitywww.coe.int/en/web/impact-convention-human-rights/familywww.coe.int/en/web/impact-convention-human-rights/#/www.coe.int/en/web/impact-convention-human-rights/-/father-wins-battle-to-see-his-son-and-rights-for-all-czech-parents
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Apr 22, 2021 21:17:37 GMT
For 10 years, 47 countries in Europe should adopt the law of common custody on children, but only a few have done so. The rest of Europe is in breach of this ECHR ruling and is not bearing any consequences. We would like to add that not only unmaried fathers are regularly discriminated against, but also maried fathers. If it were about women, we would already have marches, but with fathers and their children there is absolute silence and no one wants to stop these harms against tens of millions of fathers and their children. The legal consequences of this judgment for 47 countries are that they are obliged to implement this law in their national legal systems, but they have not done so. Moreover, they fail to fulfill their obligations and do so illegally. Any judgment of a national court inconsistent with this judgment may be challenged as unlawful. "Decision European Court of Human Rights The court noted that by dismissing the applicant’s request for joint custody without examining whether it would be in the child’s interest – the only possible decision under national law – the domestic courts had afforded him a different treatment in comparison with the mother and in comparison with married fathers. To assess whether this treatment was discriminatory for the purposes of Article 14, the court first considered that the provisions on which the domestic courts’ decisions had been based were aimed at protecting the welfare of a child born out of wedlock by determining its legal representative and avoiding disputes between the parents over custody questions. The decisions had therefore pursued a legitimate aim. It further considered that there could be valid reasons to deny the father of a child born out of wedlock participation in parental authority, for example if a lack of communication between the parents risked harming the welfare of the child. These considerations did not apply in this case, however, as the applicant continued to take regular care of the child. The court did not share the federal constitutional court’s assessment that joint custody against the mother’s will could from the outset be assumed to be contrary to the child’s interest. While it was true that legal proceedings on the attribution of parental authority could unsettle a child, domestic law provided for judicial review of the attribution of parental authority in cases where the parents were or had been married or had opted for joint parental authority. The court did not see sufficient reasons why the situation of the present case should allow for less judicial scrutiny. Consequently, there was not a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the general exclusion of judicial review of the initial attribution of sole custody to the mother and the aim pursued, namely the protection of the best interests of a child born out of wedlock. The court therefore held by six votes to one that there had been a violation of Article 14 taken together with Article 8. Judge Schmitt expressed a dissenting opinion, which is annexed to the judgment." More in link www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/family-rights-of-unmarried-father-violated-in-german-courts-1.785448?fbclid=IwAR2yvgPn_SPhCT-XJEPgFZby82b69phLzcIPeZEn--XfCTnHY9sdVlOgheA#men #women #equal #father #discriminationmen #discrimination #segregation #falseaccusations #domesticviolence #childsupport #equalparenting #parentalalienation #divorce #fraud #falseaccusationsrape #fatherless #childsharecustody #fahtermatter #law #brokenlaw #familylaw #court #depression, #depressionafterdivorce #Divorce #effectsofdivorce #health #masculinity #mentalhealth #suicidal #suicide #equalpay #equalwork #menrights #humanrights
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on May 21, 2021 7:19:32 GMT
False Allegations in Custody Cases: Questions, Observations & Comments Making false allegations in custody cases not only negatively impacts the cases, it has detrimental consequences on the children of the marriage also. httpss://www.divorcemag.com/blog/false-allegations-in-custody-cases?fbclid=IwAR2BUKtC6oX0NKlOwmcwb2IOl1Jnd7Fysz5bF8TbxZkwqjx4hGIAbd3RU-8
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Jun 11, 2021 17:55:59 GMT
Power tool advice for USA. You can successfully use this knowledge in other countries after adapting to local laws. (1) NATIONAL RETROACTIVE LEGAL SYSTEM ACCOUNTABILITY ACT for DEPRIVATION UNDER COLOR of STATE LAW RIGHTS SECURED and UNDER the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION (2) SEEK CIVIL RIGHTS ATTORNEY to VOID NON-CONSENTED "SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT" – 'A STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ‘DOES NOT MAKE AN AGREEMENT THAT WAS VOID AT ITS INCEPTION VALID BY THE MERE PASSAGE OF TIME’.” judicialcriminal.com/?fbclid=IwAR2BF1RGe7sHQ3mvtBx3u3RAHERNmoXDLEViSz0VIIEtMDJl1r60DTlvPso#men #women #equal #father #discriminationmen #discrimination #segregation #falseaccusations #domesticviolence #childsupport #equalparenting #parentalalienation #divorce #fraud #falseaccusationsrape #fatherless #childsharecustody #fahtermatter #law #brokenlaw #familylaw #court #depression, #depressionafterdivorce #Divorce #effectsofdivorce #health #masculinity #mentalhealth #suicidal #suicide #equalpay #equalwork #menrights #humanrights
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Jul 10, 2021 14:24:27 GMT
"Lionell "TJ" Tillman on how he represented himself (with no law degree) in a 2 year trial against the County of Los Angeles. June 2018, the courts dismissed his child support case for Extrinsic Fraud by the County of Los Angeles and the alleged $60,000 debt in arrears was set aside." In this link he tells how he managed to solve the problem with child support. More on his page from the photo. Advice from us: All child support payments should be mandated to be paid into a separate account accessible only debit card where all purchases can be tracked separately for easy analysis during legal disputes. "Child support" has become perverted into little more than "Single Mother Support". It is now such a corrupted part of society that has become almost a taboo because 'who could be against supporting the child amirite?'. The court can order you to pay 3000 euro/month in child support to the mother, and even if you know - without a shadow of a doubt - that the majority of that money is being spent on herself, there's nothing you can do about it. The only fair compromise to make sure the money is spent on the child is a separate account which only the father can deposit money into so that all transactions are easily segregated from any others for easy & reliable analysis. This would hold the mother accountable for her use of the child support & provide transparent legal recourse when she doesnt. If you are a father going through a divorce then I strongly recommend advising your lawyer to negotiate such an arrangement and bring it up in court. #men #women #equal #father #discriminationmen #discrimination #segregation #falseaccusations #domesticviolence #childsupport #equalparenting #parentalalienation #divorce #fraud #falseaccusationsrape #fatherless #childsharecustody #fahtermatter #law #brokenlaw #familylaw #court #depression, #depressionafterdivorce #Divorce #effectsofdivorce #health #masculinity #mentalhealth #suicidal #suicide #equalpay #equalwork #menrights #humanrights
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Aug 5, 2021 19:26:55 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Aug 12, 2021 20:34:28 GMT
It is time for States in Europe to respect the rights of fathers and their children as supreme rights. We regret to write that, apart from 4 exceptions, where the default child share custody 50/50 was introduced, the rest of the countries in Europe are reluctant to respect the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights by violating the European Convention on Human Rights. "In a recent case heard by the European Human Rights Court (ECHR), a major decision was reached concerning the enforcement of visitation for parents. The basics of the case were that the father Semen Gen of Ukraine was denied visitation with his daughter, Polina, by the child’s mother. And after exhausting all avenues to him in the state courts Mr. Gen filed his petition with the ECHR. Semen Gen and his daughter Polina In the initial complaint, Polina’s mother who is simply called V. in the documents had filed a complaint stating, “That the father was spending too much time with his daughter.” At this point, the Father and Grandparents filed a counterclaim informing the courts that the mother had prevented them from seeing Polina. Throughout the process, V. kept filing for suspensions of the visitation enforcement orders until ultimately this case arrived at the ECHR. The European Human Rights Court finally stated that the Ukrainian Government was held accountable for not having legislation in place to properly enforce the Father’s (Mr. Gen) visitation with his daughter Polina. They awarded a monetary award to Mr. Gen and the Grandparents for Ukraine not having protections to enforce a father’s rights to see his child." More in link thedailycounternews.com/2021/07/27/family-courts-vs-european-human-rights-court/?fbclid=IwAR3jYeoG8FuEKXpzM0YVWGtdNVSkdxYcw1xEZmigBfxbqbPwdHsUACAtS8c#men #women #equal #father #discriminationmen #discrimination #segregation #falseaccusations #domesticviolence #childsupport #equalparenting #parentalalienation #divorce #fraud #falseaccusationsrape #fatherless #childsharecustody #fahtermatter #law #brokenlaw #familylaw #court #depression, #depressionafterdivorce #Divorce #effectsofdivorce #health #masculinity #mentalhealth #suicidal #suicide #equalpay #equalwork #menrights #humanrights
|
|