|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Jun 21, 2024 20:42:36 GMT
Claiming that conscription based solely on male gender is fair is a deliberate attempt to maintain privileges against women's responsibility. Voting rights should only be granted to people who have registered, regardless of gender. It would be fair to deprive people of voting rights who bear no responsibility. Supporters of the legislation framed it as a more efficient and cost-effective method. "By using available federal databases, the [Selective Service] agency will be able to register all of the individuals required and thus help ensure that any future military draft is fair and equitable," Rep. Chrissy Houlahan (D–Pa.) said on the House floor. "This will also allow us to rededicate resources—basically that means money—towards reading readiness and towards mobilization…rather than towards education and advertising campaigns driven to register people." The other, unspoken effect would be removing young men's choice to engage in civil disobedience." More in link reason.com/2024/06/15/house-passes-bill-to-automatically-register-young-men-for-the-draft/
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Jun 21, 2024 20:47:49 GMT
If you are a white male you won't get a job at Disney. Discriminatory policy exposed by Vice President Michael Giordano. "Giordano says anti-white male policy affects his own career advancement Giordano also spoke about how this policy affects his own personal prospects for moving up in the company. “I think I’m for of well-prepared for it, I’m well-positioned for it, but as far as Disney is concerned I’m a white male, and that’s not who they’re looking to promote at the moment.” More in link en.as.com/latest_news/what-are-the-controversial-statements-of-michael-giordano-vice-president-of-disney-n/video:
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Jun 25, 2024 16:59:22 GMT
Feminisms lie to people that women are discriminated against in the workplace, and this is the proof. Percentages of women who applied for STEM jobs received them more frequently than the number of applications these women submitted would suggest. This means that it is easier for women to get a job in STEM than men who have completed such applications. "The reality is that, at least in recent years, women have never had it so good when it comes to getting jobs in the STEM workplace. What is the evidence for this? Well, there is the excellent paper produced by Ceci and colleagues at Cornell University. Published in the highest ranking psychology journal that I know of (impact factor of 19.228), it is 67 pages exploring a whole range of questions about the position of women in academia – from explanations for innate abilities based on prenatal testosterone levels, to whether better male networks explain male’s higher rate of publication. They conclude that: “…invitations to interview for tenure-track positions in math-intensive fields—as well as actual employment offers—reveal that female PhD applicants fare at least as well as their male counterparts in math-intensive fields” (Ceci et al 2014, p.75). Just take a look at Table 1 (below), and compare the percentage of women who applied for STEM jobs to the percentage who were offered the job." More in link www.centreformalepsychology.com/male-psychology-magazine-listings/are-men-being-discriminated-against-in-the-science-workplace
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Jul 2, 2024 17:51:39 GMT
This is another example of feminist "equality", and it should be read as privileges only for women. "The Ladies Lounge at Tasmania's Museum of Old and New Art (Mona) sought to highlight historic misogyny by banning male visitors. After being denied entry, one filed a gender discrimination lawsuit, which he won on Tuesday. "We are deeply disappointed by this decision," a Mona representative said. The velvet-clad lounge - which contains some of the museum's most-acclaimed works, from Picasso to Sidney Nolan - has been open since 2020." More in link: www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-68770187There is an update to this feminist "equality" exhibition. After losing the court case, the feminist museum will turn into a large women's toilet, in line with the founders' intentions. We must admit that it was a good decision regarding feminist "creativity", which should all go into this big toilet... after all, feminists admitted what we have known here for a long time. More in link www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd1wpegrnrxo
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Jul 2, 2024 17:53:47 GMT
In 2017, Harvard conducted research on discrimination against men in the USA. Even then, an increasing number of men felt discrimination. Today, based on the latest research such as IPSOS, we know that over 50% of men feel such discrimination. Despite the constantly deteriorating situation and the increase in factors influencing such discrimination against men, the authorities practically did nothing to counteract such a situation. Below are the Harvard survey data from 2017: "Among all men, nearly one in five report having personally experienced institutional forms of discrimination because they are men when applying for jobs (18%), when it comes to being paid equally or considered for promotion (18%), and when interacting with police (18%). Similarly, 18% of all men say they or a male family member have been unfairly stopped or treated by the police because they are men, while 16% say they or a family member have been unfairly treated by the courts because of their gender. Regarding individual or interpersonal forms of discrimination, fewer than 10% of all men report that someone has made insensitive or offensive comments or slurs about their gender. However, nearly one in five (16%) of all men say that they or a male family member have experienced violence, and 13% report experiences of threats or non-sexual harassment because they are men. Roughly one in seven men say they have considered moving because they have experienced discrimination where they live (15%), or that they have avoided normal tasks such as using public transportation or seeking medical care to avoid potential interactions with police or authority figures (13%). Summary: National Beliefs & Political Contact Overall, 44% of men believe that there is discrimination against men in America today. Men with a high school degree or less are significantly more likely (45%) than men with a college degree (34%) to believe discrimination against men exists. Among men who believe discrimination against men exists, about half (51%) say that discrimination based on the prejudice of individual people is the larger problem, while 32% say the larger problem is discrimination based in laws and government policies. Another 13% say both are equally problematic. Finally, 55% of men say that in the past year, they have been personally contacted by representatives of a political party, candidate, community organization or ballot issue encouraging them to vote or support their cause during an election. Being personally contacted in this way may lead to increased likelihood of voting or other forms of civic or political participation, particularly among racial and ethnic minority communities. Source: www.hsph.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/94/2017/12/NPR-RWJF-HSPH-Discrimination-Men-Final-Report.pdf#men #women #equal #father #discriminationmen #discrimination #segregation #falseaccusations #domesticviolence #childsupport #equalparenting #parentalalienation #divorce #fraud #falseaccusationsrape #fatherless #childsharecustody #fahtermatter #law #brokenlaw #familylaw #court #depression, #depressionafterdivorce #Divorce #effectsofdivorce #health #masculinity #mentalhealth #suicidal #suicide #equalpay #equalwork #menrights #humanrights
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Jul 20, 2024 16:11:46 GMT
The established international organization deals with men's issues and encourages people to join them. "On July 11, the International Council for Men and Boys hosted its inaugural “She for He” press conference. The “She for He” inaugural press conference event featured a distinguished lineup of speakers addressing crucial issues affecting men and boys worldwide. The ICMB is dedicated to addressing the 12 areas of male disadvantage, including education, health, suicide, homelessness, false allegations, parental alienation, violence, criminal system biases, intimate partner violence, boys’ issues, workplace safety, reproductive rights, and media portrayals. (1) More in link www.menandboys.net/she-for-he-movement-gains-momentum-at-international-press-conference/#men #women #equal #father #discriminationmen #discrimination #segregation #falseaccusations #domesticviolence #childsupport #equalparenting #parentalalienation #divorce #fraud #falseaccusationsrape #fatherless #childsharecustody #fahtermatter #law #brokenlaw #familylaw #court #depression, #depressionafterdivorce #Divorce #effectsofdivorce #health #masculinity #mentalhealth #suicidal #suicide #equalpay #equalwork #menrights
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Jul 30, 2024 15:34:27 GMT
A large proportion of men involved in family disputes fall into financial problems, including homelessness. Unfortunately, people often draw misleading conclusions that someone deserved such a fate without knowing the actual reasons. "The family court system is fraught with challenges that can devastate families. Issues such as false allegations, parental alienation, and coercive control are rampant, leaving many parents feeling helpless and marginalized. The advocate in question has made it their mission to bring these issues to light, campaigning for a more just and compassionate system that prioritizes the well-being of children and the rights of parents. Their work involves organizing rallies, speaking at events, and using their platform to amplify the voices of those who are often unheard. Despite the personal hardships they face, their commitment to this cause has never wavered. This dedication stems from a deep-seated belief that every parent deserves to be treated fairly and with dignity, and that no child should be used as a pawn in legal battles. Leading the worldwide rally for family law reform is no small feat, especially for someone battling homelessness. This advocate’s leadership has inspired many, showing that one’s circumstances do not define their ability to effect change. Their story is a testament to the power of resilience and the importance of fighting for justice, even in the face of personal adversity." More in link afatherstruth1.wixsite.com/aftprn/post/the-unseen-struggle-fighting-for-family-law-reform-while-battling-homelessness
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Jul 30, 2024 15:36:53 GMT
Women's empowerment is nothing more than discrimination against men, which leads to negative consequences. "America First Legal (AFL), the group that complained about CrowdStrike to the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), did not blame DEI for the bug that crashed some 8.5 million computers globally. But critics of DEI say it's problematic because jobs and promotions are awarded based on sex and skin color — not talent — leaving companies less efficient as their products and services suffer." More in link www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/cbs-sued-jeff-vaughn-alleged-racial-quotas-1235938456/
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Jul 30, 2024 15:48:36 GMT
The myth that feminism is for gender equality is a recurring one in this article. Feminism has never been and is not for equality between men and women, but for the domination of women over men, which is confirmed by the common slogans of "empowering women". Does empowerment mean equality? Absolutely not, it is the denial of equality, which confirms that women are not as responsible as men. Moreover, women often go unpunished for crimes for which men go to prison. Therefore, the claim that men are against equality is a lie. Men are against their discrimination and women's lack of responsibility in all areas of life. "Certainly there is some evidence from recent surveys that young men are more lukewarm about feminism, compared to both their female peers and older men. In a 2023 Equimundo survey, for example, only half of men aged 18-23 agreed with the statement, “Feminism has made America a better place”, lower than the share of men in older age groups (up to the age of 45). This survey and others also include a range of questions about whether men or women have it harder today, which gender faces more discrimination, whether feminism and/or the move for women’s rights has “gone too far”, and so on." More in link ofboysandmen.substack.com/p/no-young-men-are-not-turning-away
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Aug 17, 2024 10:38:10 GMT
Despite the fact that women in the US significantly outnumber men in universities, they are still supported more by special funds dictated exclusively for women. Such discrimination against men is prohibited by law, but widely practiced. "Many universities offer scholarships specifically for women, but do not offer similar support for men. A 2019 study of 200 colleges by SAVE Services found “57% of institutions offer scholarships that facially violate provisions of Title IX that ban sex-based discrimination.” There are numerous current examples as well. The Velma E. Stuit Scholarship, offered at The University of Iowa, awards up to $2,500 to full-time female undergraduate students enrolled in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences. The university also offers the Myrtle K. Maier Scholarship which is available to juniors majoring in physics but “with preference to a female student.” The University of Iowa does not offer any scholarships exclusively for men. Massachusetts Institute of Technology offers several scholarships exclusively for women. The Laya Wiesner Award is an annual scholarship available to any undergraduate female student. MIT’s Women’s League Scholarships are also available to female students and are funded through the university’s endowment. MIT offers no scholarships specifically for male students." More in link www.thecollegefix.com/male-students-do-better-on-act-get-less-financial-aid/
|
|
|
Post by Stopsegregationofmen on Aug 30, 2024 20:42:17 GMT
Not only do women receive fewer prison sentences or shorter prison terms for the same crimes, but now they want them to have no criminal liability at all, because it harms women. Following this "female logic", if it harms women, it harms men in the same way. Why should female criminals be treated differently from male criminals and not go to prison? To allow women complete impunity just for their gender. “These sentences are long enough for women to lose their homes, their children, and any stability within their communities, whilst doing little to address the reasons that drove them to offend in the first place. “We already have more effective solutions which deliver lower rates of reoffending, keep families together, and provide women with the support they need for a life away from crime." So let's look at the statistics from the UK and as you can see below women are the least representative group in prisons, so sentences for women should be tougher not shorter so that society is protected from all criminals regardless of gender. No double standards and different punishments based on gender. "Women in prisons: How the numbers stack up Ministry of Justice (MoJ) research in 2021 found that 41 per cent of female offenders received sentences up to and including three months, compared to 26 per cent of men, while 28 per cent of women were handed jail terms between three and 12 months, compared to 31 per cent of males. A higher proportion of men received sentences of more than a year, or more than four years, with women having lower than average prison terms than men, due to a higher proportion of females being sentenced for offences that receive less jail time. The latest MoJ statistics show that as of 30 June this year, there were 84,043 men in prison, and 3,683 women." Parties that create double standards and special privileges for women should be avoided by men because their programs are anti-male. More in link inews.co.uk/news/politics/thousands-women-avoid-jail-sentences-3244107
|
|